Player Record

LOCAL DEMO PROFILES · SAVED ON THIS BROWSER

Follow a player’s assessment history.

Fictional profiles only. This prototype stores measurements, equipment choices and readiness reviews on this device/browser. There is no login, cloud sync or clinical patient record. Clearing site data or private browsing can remove records. Export a backup regularly.

PROFILE OVERVIEW · DEMO-07

Physical history and psychological review.

A descriptive overview of recorded data. No combined readiness score or automatic return-to-sport decision is calculated.

Latest result in each measurement series

Series remain separate by test, side and exact setup identifier. Older shoulder ER, hip adductor and knee force / hop / jump entries without complete structured protocols are retained individually and are not linked or compared. The reference is the most recent recorded baseline on or before the result date. Percentage change describes a difference; it does not indicate improvement or clearance.

Latest recorded psychological review

STEP 1 · TREATING SPORTS PHYSICIAN · DEMO-07

Choose the equipment you can access.

New profiles start with basic equipment: measuring tape / floor markers and a stopwatch. Existing profiles retain their saved equipment. Equipment availability filters measurement options; the physician selects clinically appropriate tests.

Quick choices replace the equipment selection and remove unavailable tests from the current battery. Recorded history is preserved. Tick any other devices you actually have below.

A stable chair or bench, wall, clear space and other setup aids may also be needed by the chosen protocol. Their availability alone does not enable a new test. Timed, distance and functional tests do not replace dynamometer strength measurements; no force in N is inferred or estimated.

Record device model, test position, calibration/output, repetitions and scoring method in the setup identifier. Different devices or protocols remain separate measurement series; units are not automatically converted.

STEP 2 · PHYSICIAN-SELECTED BATTERY

Build the player’s measurement battery.

Select a body region, then tick the available tests here. Unavailable tests show the missing equipment. Equipment compatibility does not establish test safety or a complete assessment battery.

These example mappings cover measurement equipment, not every clinical prerequisite. All tasks need an appropriate setup and professional protocol. Exertion recording requires a bike or treadmill, timer and heart-rate monitor, and belongs to a supervised concussion pathway.

STEP 3 · PLAYER VOICE + PROFESSIONAL REVIEW

Psychological readiness for the next step

Physical measurements and psychological readiness are separate parts of the return-to-sport discussion. Record the planned activity, the player’s perspective and the clinician’s interpretation.

Fictional demo only. These discussion prompts are not a validated questionnaire and produce no combined score. Psychological readiness is not the same as cognitive recovery after concussion or a mental-health diagnosis.

Instrument selection is diagnosis-specific. Use the original validated version and its published scoring instructions. This demo does not reproduce questionnaire items, calculate instrument scores or apply pass/fail thresholds.

Read the references and instrument limitations →

Recorded measurements

All entries for the selected fictional profile, including baseline references. Clinical context is kept beside each measurement.

SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUND · REVIEWED 2 OCTOBER 2026

References & evidence boundaries

These selected sources inform the concepts and named measurements below. They do not validate the Ice Performance Lab software, its equipment mapping, its full test catalogue or a hockey-wide return-to-sport algorithm. This is a curated starting bibliography, not a systematic evidence review.

1. Ardern CL et al. (2016). Bern consensus on return to sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine.

   Application and limits: Consensus framework: physical, psychological and contextual factors; no universal clearance score.

2. Webster KE, Feller JA, Lambros C. (2008). Development and preliminary validation of ACL-RSI. Physical Therapy in Sport 9(1):9–15.

   Application and limits: Original ACL reconstruction population; diagnosis-specific psychological readiness, not validation of this demo.

3. Gerometta A et al. (2018). SIRSI validation after traumatic shoulder instability. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 26:203–211.

   Application and limits: Shoulder instability; original validation in rugby athletes. Do not generalise to all shoulder diagnoses or all hockey players.

4. Glazer DD. (2009). Development and preliminary validation of I-PRRS. Journal of Athletic Training 44(2):185–189.

   Application and limits: Preliminary validation in a small injured collegiate-athlete sample. Original total score: 0–60; use the documented version and scoring method.

5. Patricios JS et al. (2023). Amsterdam 2022 concussion consensus. British Journal of Sports Medicine 57:695–711.

   Application and limits: Concussion assessment and staged return. Exercise duration or a confidence rating alone cannot establish recovery or clearance.

6. Stark T et al. (2011). Hand-held dynamometry: systematic review. PM&R 3(5):472–479.

   Application and limits: Strength measurement evidence; setup and examiner effects matter. Different devices and protocols are not treated as interchangeable.

7. Tucci HT et al. (2014). CKCUES test reliability study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 15:1.

   Application and limits: Test reliability in the studied groups. Reliability does not establish a safe return-to-sport threshold.

8. Powden CJ, Hoch JM, Hoch MC. (2015). Weight-bearing lunge test reliability: systematic review. Manual Therapy 20(4):524–532.

   Application and limits: Ankle dorsiflexion measurement reliability and measurement error. Small changes require protocol-specific interpretation.

9. Wellsandt E, Failla MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. (2017). Limb symmetry can overestimate knee function after ACL injury. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy.

   Application and limits: Side-to-side symmetry may hide deficits. Historical capacity and the wider clinical picture remain relevant.

What is original to this demo?

The confidence and fear prompts (0–10), interface, equipment filter and descriptive charts are custom demo features. The two prompts are not ACL-RSI, SIRSI or I-PRRS, are not validated screening instruments and do not produce a diagnostic or combined readiness score. The reference list does not imply endorsement by the cited authors.

Questionnaire and publication rights

Questionnaire names and bibliographic links are provided for attribution. This page does not reproduce complete questionnaires, publisher figures or full articles. A citation or public availability does not grant permission to reproduce, translate, adapt or commercially distribute an instrument. Check the rights holder’s current terms and obtain any required permission before adding questionnaire items or licensed material to a future product.

External links open the cited provider’s website and may be subject to its access and privacy terms. Reading the source is recommended before applying any named test.

DEMO PURPOSE & DATA HANDLING · VERSION 2 OCTOBER 2026

Use, privacy & professional responsibility

Educational demonstration only

This public prototype demonstrates recording and visualising fictional assessment data. It is not intended for patient care, diagnosis, treatment prescription, injury-risk prediction or medical clearance. Do not enter real player names, patient identifiers, real health information or identifiable free-text notes. A DEMO code does not anonymise an identifiable person.

A larger measurement, closer side-to-side result or higher confidence does not by itself establish healing or safe participation. No test battery here is complete for every injury. Testing requires a clinically appropriate, documented protocol and professional assessment of safety, symptoms, tissue healing and sport exposure.

What this assessment module stores

The module stores fictional profile codes, selected equipment and tests, measurement results, dates, setup identifiers, notes and readiness reviews in this browser’s local storage (key: ipl-assessment-demo-v1). Its assessment code does not send these form entries to a server or cloud player database. This statement concerns the assessment module; normal website hosting, access logs and other site services are separate.

Anyone with access to this browser profile may be able to view the saved entries. There is no user authentication, role-based access or clinical-record security. Entries remain until browser site data are cleared; private browsing and storage limits may cause loss. Exported JSON backups contain the entered notes and results and must be handled accordingly. Do not use this demo as a clinical record.

To remove local demo entries, use your browser’s site-data settings for iceperformancelab.com; this can also remove other site data and sign-in state. Export any fictional work you wish to retain first.

Responsibility and contact

Medical/editorial responsibility: Dr. Tamás Bányai, Ice Performance Lab. See the Impressum / Legal Notice for provider details. Report a content or calculation issue to tamas.banyai@orthoisarpark.de; do not send personal health information through this feedback route.

These notices do not waive statutory rights or liability that cannot lawfully be excluded. They are not a certification of legal or regulatory compliance.